City Design Redux

OK, that “New Urban Design” entry I did earlier today was a disaster. But rather than try to edit it, here I’ll just try to summarize what I meant to say.

I want more nature in everyday life. I’m a green in my heart, but I want my tech. I’m not of the “back to nature” variety. I’m an electric green, a viridian green. I want my tech, but I want it designed with ecology & habitat in mind. I want efficiency and intelligence, and also spirit and passion. Playful pragmatism meeting envronmental science. City planning and building design is just another form of tech, like the wheel and the abacus. Much of city planning is still stuck in the dark ages, or at best, not far out of the 19th century. Sprawl is the problem of the 20th century, but we still have even older problems to deal with. For me, traditional park planning in cities is technology on the level of the abacus. We can do better than that. The whole city should be a park, but not in a back-to-the-trees luddite kind of way. Not literally.

In that context, I find this exciting, even if it has been going on for decades. And I find this and this encouraging.

Share

About Adam

A culture geek and techie living in New York City.
This entry was posted in Technology. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to City Design Redux

  1. Holly says:

    You may be interested in this – a cool building in Melbourne which is both techy and environmentally friendly.

    http://www.60lgreenbuilding.com/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>