I’ve been thinking a little bit lately about the way people tell stories – about themselves, about each other – to create a sense of identity and self-knowledge, to guide future actions, etc. I’ve been thinking about how these stories are continually revised, updated, reverted, and changed.
So it was with interest that I came across this post about the cultural memory of social morés. It seems David Brooks wrote some column lamenting the loss of romanticism in the “twitter age” or some such nonsense. I’d caught glimpses of Ezra Klein criticizing him, but this seems the best observation to me:
…there’s a reason why he called it the “Happy Days” era: the past he’s describing isn’t really the past, but a 70s-era TV version of the past. Not even the past’s representation of itself! For that, you’d have to see On the Waterfront or read On the Road or Giovanni’s Room. It’s memory as ideology, created (whether consciously or unconsciously) to surreptitiously win arguments about the present, especially about social morés and generational change.
And the Happy Days era — the real one, which was reflected in the TV show like a funhouse mirror — was driven by technological and social change, too! Kids had access to cars, telephones, TV, records and the radio, and disposable cash. Cruising, malt shops, high school dances, drive-in movies, everything you see in American Graffiti — it might feel like part of the timeless social ritual now, but then, it was a revolution, a set of truly radical acts. Add the pill, civil rights, and a swelling in the ranks of college students, and you’ve got feminism, counter-culture, the sexual revolution. But in some ways, this was a postscript. The most important changes, the subterranean ones, had all happened already.
As someone who has often had an attraction to various depicted eras in theater, books, film, and television, and as someone with a renewed interest in the study of culture in general, it’s a useful insight and reminder that the way societies dream about themselves rarely represents the reality “on the ground,” so to speak. And one of the hallmarks of society since the industrial age, or perhaps slightly before, has been somewhat constant social change, combatted by regressives and curmudgeonly types of all kinds.
Much like language, sexual behaviors and courtship will be what they will be. There’s no right or wrong way. Welcome to humanity, twitter & facebook. Your time is likely short; you’d better enjoy it!
I love this post. As I find my way to answers about my own personal myth, learn new ways of intimacy, and fight the desire to reject all human interaction , this reminds me that the stories of our past are ALWAYS changing. Ase!